Telephone Wire Burial Grade

So much the same .....

One day a hare saw a crow on a branch apollaiato and asks: "Hello Raven, what do you do?". And the crow answered: "A cock." And the hare, " Why, do not you get bored? ". The Crow:" No it is very enjoyable and rewarding, you should try too. "So the hare, curiously, he sits at the base of the tree and start not doing shit! Shortly after passing there's a fox, and you eat the hare.
Moral: do not for a dick .. You must be seated very high!

you ask what does all this with the receiver is a blog dedicated to them.
has nothing to do absolutely nothing, absolutely nothing, but both receivers can tell anything, so much the same.
You can say important things or huge crap so the intellectual level of reception does not move one iota by continuing to remain at the same level of a flat encephalogram.
E 'futile attempt to involve them in something important or try to make them understand the gravity of certain situations, would not pretend to understand all of the remaining indifferent.
you'll hear the usual phrases "What can we do?" “chi ci guiderebbe?”, “ho una famiglia da mantenere” o addirittura “la FIT non mi ha comunicato nulla”, e così via; anni e anni di duro impegno e di professionalità spese al mantenimento di uno stato di indifferenza e di ignoranza totale.
Tutti pronti a prostituirsi per pochi spiccioli salvo poi piangersi addosso quando le cose non vanno come vorrebbero; tutti pronti a correre a firmare la prima cazzata che gli viene proposta per poi lamentarsi dei costi elevati che gli mangiano gli esigui guadagni.
Tutti pronti a definirsi grandi professionisti per poi vantarsi di vendere un’infinità di gratta e vinci ( alla faccia della professionalità ), “si ma il guadagno è tanto commitment is not "... .. very true! Fill yourself but not his mouth with his professionalism. The same applies to the slot, but then they complain because the Chinese empty.
now the arguments are just that: the slots and scratch cards and in fact are the only two items that have a surplus in the world of games, everything else has a negative sign and do not give a damn to anybody because nobody talks about it and nobody cares. Does any
is committed to the category you are really committed, because we believed and did so in an unselfish way to spend time and money to try to change things, to finally make the receivers players and in return got the usual stops indifference.
When you are born "sheep" you can not die "wolf" when the IQ stops at the door of his shop is useless to tell the world that there is outside. They are right
Stefano Elio Frisian and Samson when they say that nothing has changed and that is just wasted time, have reason to sell ... .. not worth it!
Just take a ride in the post ricevitore.net to understand the "level" and to believe that ... just the same!


Luber

Gloryholesinsacramento

As always .......

Ricevitore.net The forum post you read about the orientation of the receivers to vote:
"You who would you vote? Berlusconi or Veltroni "or" we hope that guy gets elected, "we hope to be elected foo", etc..
It sounds very funny and, in some ways, ridiculous.
But what changes to the receivers if the government goes Berlusconi or Veltroni? Absolutely nothing at all, perhaps the subject of complaints and whining, but in practice would not change anything.
Or, rather, any changes there may be and to be operated from anywhere in the receivers would remain inert and passive as ever.
many governments have changed? There have been many upheavals on games? And what has changed in the usual receivers ?.... nothing!
Votes continued to complain (as usual), continued to cry on (as usual), continued to blame the faults now this now that (as always), continued to dichiarasi "sacrifices" of the interests of the usual lobbies (such as always) and, finally, they have passively accepted everything (as always) adapting to the circumstances of the moment (as always) Fuck everything and everyone (as usual), waiting for someone else to take any action that, as always, were ignored by all.

Now read post on the political expectations of the receivers is almost tender.



Luber

You Man Breast Feeding Vidio

serfs

From the above data (source AAMS) states that the entire sector "games" is based almost exclusively on the Scratch & Win and Slots.
fact these are the only two positive entries in the table, all the others are the hyphen.
Despite this, the total tax revenues is up by 7.1% and this is enough to claim victory AAMS and its strategy, defined by the same body, winning.

For operators, however, these data should make us think, should highlight how the professionals are mortified exclusively for the benefit of profit and economic interests of the various "lobbies" which hold the concessions.

The receiver as such is intended to gradually disappear, to become a "money changers" (if this is not the automatic), a "rubber-stamping" and so on.
And all this is added the fact that will not (as has not yet), no decision making on corporate strategies.
This leads, inevitably, the accentuation of the power managed by the various dealers, with the complicity of the AAMS, operating real "blackmail" like "you want the corner? You have to put my slot, "and in a little ', "the Superenalotto want? You have to put my slot, "and so on.
I should not wonder if similar "strategies" were soon applied also on "scratch"!
The traditional games such as Lotto, The Pools, the Tris etc. Professionalism of those games where the receiver is crucial, where the relationship is established directly with customers - nearly custom - no longer interested in the "lords of the palace" that In fact, with a series of targeted measures (third extraction, increased the deductions on your winnings, etc..), they made sure that people constantly move away from those games (and the data are clear about this) diverting their attention on the Scratch & Win and Slots.
Those games where the chimera of instant win game and without mental effort, create a relationship of dependency that will not be able to do without.
The alarm on social issues related to gambling reflects the widespread perception of the growing seriousness of the problem. The massive invasion of slot machines, the huge growth of the legal opportunities to gamble ("Scratch") feeds the vain hope (the-Ludere-enter the game) of many, and we know that the second half of Hope is often called de-illusion (always referring etymon- out of the game-). But at the same time, it is evident unthinkability to intervene on issues related to gambling through prohibitionist perspective, (the idea of \u200b\u200boutright banning many forms of gambling as well as be extremely unpopular would deprive the state of substantial economic resources to see that revenues for the game are a real form of taxation in parallel.). If we consider the problem of a compulsive gambler in analogy to the problem of addiction is clear that the "drug dealer" would be more important than the state itself, so that should go first to the dock, the player's mind that would fall into disrepair (and all the effect is) the person to help. We also know that social policy of strict prohibition, they do but the development of alternative circuits illegal immigrants.
And it is precisely this that the State "play" not for nothing that AAMS's slogan is "fair play", but despite all the clandestine game has not diminished, in fact, criminal organizations have even entered the so-called "fair play" .

But back to the receivers.
receivers, as always, they follow the wave, the exclusive interest of the workshop: "scratchcards make most of the Lotto? Well! I sell more scratch! "But the professionalism? The development and deployment of systems? Who cares! A less effort, with the scratch cards earn more and work less!
Verissimo, if they make a decision like that and it is in some respects, it is also rightly so, in the end is the result that counts.
but I can not explain why many receivers complain about the decline of Lotto, the Super and the other games, just sell the scratch cards and keep a couple of slots to compensate for the losses and even to earn more with less effort.
But in the end who really are the receivers?
can safely be called the "serf"

Servitude of serfdom was a judicial figure that tied the peasants to a specific plot of land (serfs, in Latin, it is the " sod " land) . The serfs cultivated the funds that belonged to the landlords, paying a rent . They were also to pay tenth (if the owner was part of the clergy or was a ecclesiastical entity ) and were obliged to provide certain services work ( corvées ). The serfs were such birth, and could not (legally) to avoid that condition without the consent of the owner of the land. In connection with the work for the clearing of new lands, often gave the owner who shall bear the burden of moving to new areas in particular freedom ( deductibles ) And privileges: hence the name "Villafranca" given to many places.
services to which the serfs were required, it should be noted, unlike slavery did not have a generic, but they were precisely defined. Moreover, the serfs, unlike slaves, were not considered " things " but people were entitled to Private , though limited to goods mobile, they could marry, have children to whom to leave a ' legacy . The feudal was not entitled to the life of a serf but could be sold with land on which he had the right and duty to remain.

me the similarities are clear, and, above all, very contemporary.

Luber