Networks friends ": the world of services that tobacco can make available to the public.
Basic services for the citizen who, coming from the tobacco shop in the hours most convenient to him, can not use the small advantage of being able to conclude some of the most "boring" daily tasks without any discomfort, to avoid queues and saving precious time.
This is claimed by boss Giovanni Risso FIT. He's right, in fact it is so, in fact, the city has some advantages (although at higher costs than those charged by post office), can take advantage of times well above those of Post, avoid the queues and so on. They also benefit the "operators" that do not put some of their networks available for free and decided, also in a manner and costs, and last but not least you FIT will recognized their "slice" at no cost and without obligation. And
Tabaccai receivers? Well, for them is a different matter: they will recognize a premium ridiculous (as usual), 50 or 60 cents per transaction, will have to pay the surety bonds (almost all in Ecomap - FIT), will assume all risks with a circulation of more cash in their coffers, must assume the burden of costs, will not have the usual entry in the chapter on management of services, etc.. etc..
course there are the usual who will say that services will bring more people within the business and therefore potential buyers of other properties available. Extemporaneous statements promptly refuted by the facts and that can have a positive response only in those businesses located in large cities or high points in transition and will instead penalize those activities present in small towns or suburbs.
A question however arises: who decides
the fees to be paid to tobacco / receivers?
Who is for them?
Because these "fees" are never discussed again and adequate? Could
these things we should not ever know and no one bothers to clarify?
least for the games there are legal provisions that establish the premiums, for services do not. Surely
FIT has a say in this matter, given the emphasis with which announces the services, then it is likely for her to deal with different operators, of course without the slightest thought to consult their "base" (as would any trade union that called himself that), before deciding on the skin of others.
And lest anyone rebels against this state of affairs and continues to subsidize the FIT subscribing passively accepting the card and services fees from hunger?
So many questions and no answers - or answers rhetorical and trivially DISCOUNT -, the fact is that among the various services it should add another: "the dignity" ... .. would be the most popular because it is free of charge!
Luber
