Semsame Street Wallpaper

's friend Donato

I just learned of the serious grief that struck his friend Donald.
How many words can spend there is nothing that can soothe the pain of losing a child.
Right now I feel empty of all, everything seems pointless and trivial I would just embrace Donato and his family, in silence without saying anything. A hug of heart


Luigi

Kayes Playgroundbikini

AT HOME ......

I'm reading everything and more about the new contract Sisal: who does not sign because it is too expensive, who do not sign because there is inside with fees, because he has made those who signed the accounts and their interests , who signs it spends even less than before, who did not sign because other alternatives, and so on ... ...
not by the merits of the choices made, shall be selected and each is assuming its responsibility for having done so, what puzzles me is the fact that no one enters the substance of the situation, neither does the question of principle and morality of the contract Sisal, anyone who makes a collective discourse. They
accounts only facts and nothing else. Someone said that his house is the one that suits them and not accountable to anyone ... ... anyone else have said that the unions do not give a damn and that he be "entrepreneur" makes the choices in your business (but then FIT & C. foraging maybe because they do not even know how to present the holiday).
These "entrepreneurs" and their motivations is better to stay away, this is that if people see someone attacked in the street turns away because the important thing is it did not happen to him, and if unfortunately (or luck), happens to him and no one intervenes, then it is the first to scream about solidarity, citizenship and so on. No, these "entrepreneurs" it is better to stay away.
The refrain that "every man to his doing what he pleases" is hackneyed by now, what 's the news? It 's always been that way, everyone has always done his cabbages, and tell you more, very often has enjoyed the misfortunes of others if those misfortunes could profit from it.
Most receivers are mavericks, but then pretend to do when it's convenient pack, and soon after, like the bite when it needs it most.
Entrepreneurs? But entrepreneurs who are just "jobbers" who sell products others, decided by others, whose prices are determined by others, the quantity of merchandise to sell is determined by others, and even what they have to earn is determined by others and then turn to these other means may also pick up the balls the goods and the "entrepreneurs" can be found on the floor with your ass!
They have only the "stand" on which the goods and therefore expose themselves as "entrepreneurs" Well done! You do well to say that everyone at home is what he wants, but let us truly a pleasure ... .. stay at home and Spare us the morality of shopkeepers or obtuse utterances of those who think they know we do not understand a blessed bat.


Luber

How To Make Ezio's Hidden Dagger

and they all lived happily ever

E 'useless to make so many speeches, it is useless to externalize resentment, it is useless to petty rhetoric, the reality is that most receivers will sign the contract and Sisal enough!
It matters little if they do or believe they are forced by circumstances or otherwise, will sign it.
E 'consideration? E 'discriminating? E 'unfair? It matters little, or really care but does not change one iota the reality of things.
other hand, even in the previous contract Sisal impose a fee, which later became known as "technology package" or "membership fee" little changed in substance, provided €. 108 per month si doveva sborsare e le linee telefoniche sono sempre state a carico dei ricevitori.
Il principio applicato nel contratto attuale è lo stesso, solo i costi sono aumentati, ma il principio è rimasto invariato.
Se poi questi principi vengono avallati anche da pseudo sindacati (STS-FIT), allora ci si deve rassegnare, non c’è proprio più nulla da fare: “prendere o lasciare”, non esiste via di mezzo.
Solo i ricevitori stessi potrebbero cambiare questo stato di cose, ma sono in grado di farlo?
Sono in grado di stracciare tutte le tessere associative (STS-FIT-UTIS ecc.) che fino ad ora hanno tutelato esclusivamente i propri interessi e quelli dei gestori?
Sono in grado di compattarsi e scendere in square one?
are able to practice any form of strike?
I can fight for legal recognition of the category?
I can leave aside their differences and finally talk to each other, subsidiaries and represent themselves?
The answers to these questions are obvious and lie in the historical record so I would say no, the receivers will never be able to change anything.
continue, as always, to grow their own herb garden, to feed the usual "known" and get caught constantly kick your ass ... ... and they all lived happily ever after!



Luber

Home Inspector Salary 2010

SISAL

fees (even broken down by income groups), the loan for a fee etc. reflections should not be made on these aspects that are just the logical consequence of a situation far more alarming and requires more stringent analysis of the facts.
Sisal, by virtue of winning the lottery contract, he received a de facto monopoly of this game (which it already had more).
Under this monopoly, and the resulting dominant position assumed, Sisal that the "rules" that go in one direction, namely the protection of exclusive and increasing its economic interests, more dangerous that his actions interaction can have a disastrous su molti ricevitori e, di riflesso, sui giocatori.
Basta leggere il nuovo contratto proposto da Sisal: è una lunga sequela di imposizioni, di doveri e di costi tutti riferiti ai ricevitori, ai quali è lasciata un’unica scelta: “prendere o lasciare”.
Tutto secondo il solito e ben collaudato copione.
Ma chi vive di soli giochi come fa a lasciare? E’ costretto ad accettare le clausole capestro di Sisal, nella speranza di poter almeno rientrare dai costi; deve ingoiare per forza il “boccone amaro”.
Sisal questo lo sa bene e anche nello studiare le ridicole quanto aberranti fasce di canone ( i cosiddetti decili), ha fatto bene i suoi calcoli al punto tale che in massimo cinque anni, with only those charges, will return on their investments, not to mention that in the meantime, the game will be revenue for the Sisal true and pure profit.
Under the guise of providing incentives to receivers alleged new game strategies, causes them to produce more to pay less rent. With this nice little game Sisal ensures consistent and profitable revenue, giving up a sop to the receivers insignificant.
She looked good - as it would make more sense - to make a speech of incentives on the premium receivers and that is "the more you produce the more you increase the premium" never! The speech is "the more you produce, and pay less, but always pay it and not gain that is only the prerogative of Sisal.
Someone might object claiming that a major production is a higher gain, it is true but we must bear in mind that the more money you have to pay the costs Sisal you require and how that fee is a minimum of € .800 plus vat at the end are € .960, equal to 1,920 columns lottery in which the receiver does not gain anything but on which Sisal, however, receives its premium.
Now let's say that all the 23,000 points collected (these amendments will be soon), go to the first band fee (€. 8oo + VAT) to cover the costs of fee collection points will produce, for free, 44160000 columns (1.920x23.000), annual Sisal on which will still have its premium, plus €. 18,400,000 + VAT, revenue from fees payable (800x23.000). The calculations of the gentlemen
Sisal them are well made, at the end to their budgets must balance, if those receivers are not important to them in red.
The thing that is left somewhat puzzled as to consider STS Sisal an innovative, fair and reasonable as you arrogate the right to represent the receivers, just as a trade union that STS (at least that is defined) can protect only if itself and the "mother" who bore her, that FIT. FIT
Ah! Then everything is explained (as always), everything has a logic. ... The circle.
In the end it always has been, nothing new, but all over this state of things the receivers are exempt from liability?
Definitely not, the receivers have never been and never will be a category, their short-sightedness and stupidity has allowed anyone to take them with impunity slaps and continue to do so without the slightest expression of a reaction of pride and dignity.
No! It is not the fee, the loan for a fee, the number of heavy taxes. ... Is the self-esteem that the receivers have been lost and it is thanks to this that some people can afford anything against them.
E 'futile shouting "strike," "Not to sign the contract" and so on. , How many times it has been said and the results we can see them.
This is the situation "take it or leave it", the rest is talk, it is ridiculous to continue to poke fun.

Luber

Sample Dental Office Letters

AGREEMENT AND I PAY ......

After the award of the concession Superenalotto Sisal announces new gaming and telecommunications network.
Basically the game does not change if the quotas for the allocation of the winnings and other little things that do not become less certain of what is unfair and that will definitely help make it more palatable.
The steady decline in recent years would suggest to more substantial changes, not just a change of "habit", which in fact is. The new lottery
announced and called "Eurojackpot" is ridiculous when compared with the already proven and disclosed "Euromillions", and if you think that will be played by Sweden and Finland - countries historically disinclined to the game - the outcome of the result is obvious in departure.
The enlargement of the collection points, from the current 18,000 to 23,000, will only pulverize even more the game (Lotto sign).
As for the new terminal "Leonardo", the same is ready for a few years (according to As reported by the same technical Sisal), and was still in storage awaiting allocation of the notice and if the same had not been won by Sisal, on terminals now we would have been written "Snai" or "Lottomatica" or anybody else won the invitation.
The real change is the substantial fees paid by receivers that are linked to productivity and the same goes from 800 to 2,000 euros per year and, of course, costs related to telephone lines and so on. Virtually receivers will make a payment to a Sisal "piecework".
With this "real" change and the expansion of the network is Sisal ensure the return of investments, in a very short time, the rest is pure profit compared with a dummy and a change in business risk to zero.
But let's be realistic! The Superenalotto
month after month has consistently negative in the collection and Sisal which is to launch it again? Increases clearance points, increases the amount of the percentage of winnings of low-end (a three from the current € 10.-About-can win, how much? € 20.), But with the same formula of play the odds will always be the same and it will not be the choice of Superstar to encourage the players.
The new terminal! Players who cares the new terminal? For them it does not change nothing.
The massive advertising campaign! On what? On an old product, unfair, to which players are gradually moving away?
But let's be serious! This would be the renewal of the lottery? And let us not come the same old joke of "dead wood" to root out, because in the end those who stay and pay enough. In some ways
Lottomatica behaved more "serious": she has renewed the Lot (not within the substance of findings); changed the terminals, has changed the telephone lines, has invested in advertising and so on .... But to the receivers did not pay anything more!
So what? There are more fools or more serious?


Luber

Black Man Genital Warts

Chronicle of a Death Foretold

After reading the data from the Lotto, Slots and all the other games would be easy to say "I told you so", but that does not move the problem. For some time the Co.Na.Ri. issued and published tables of data from which it noted the slow and inexorable decline of the games, which now fall in the official organs confirmed. Of this have been noticed (as if they knew ...) and that Lottomatica and Sisal they do? They call on the receivers to increase the volumes of play to achieve certain goals (set by them) in exchange for promising prizes and various crap. Also make calls to the receivers for their reporting of targets and to spur them to do more, as if the decline of games depended on them. These gentlemen forget that for law to promote the game is up to them and not to the receivers to customers who only need to advertise the promotions made by the operator. This is another cowardly way of not taking responsibility for their choices had nefarious or complicity in supporting the choices made by AAMS. So they can always say that if you have not obtained certain numbers is the fault of the receivers who do not have enough incentive to play.
FIT is doing the same thing with tobacco, send text messages reminding not to sell cigarettes to minors. Certainly there will be tobacco shops that do it but most observe the rules, but FIT, in anticipation of a possible liberalization of the sale of tobacco products, attempts to spring up the ass so he can always say that the possible loss of the exclusive fault of tobacconists selling cigarettes to minors, both she and the current state of things with his hands in dough "fine" company business can well do without the contribution of Tobacco; get what he wanted he got so who cares of Tobacco.
However, despite all glad to hear that the receivers do not break down in front of everything "so we are betting and scratch cards" and then there are also services: the telephone cards, stamps car, the payment of fines , Enel and so on. and then you can always install a distributor of snacks or drinks ... .. and that's it ... what's the problem?



Luber