After the award of the concession Superenalotto Sisal announces new gaming and telecommunications network.
Basically the game does not change if the quotas for the allocation of the winnings and other little things that do not become less certain of what is unfair and that will definitely help make it more palatable.
The steady decline in recent years would suggest to more substantial changes, not just a change of "habit", which in fact is. The new lottery
announced and called "Eurojackpot" is ridiculous when compared with the already proven and disclosed "Euromillions", and if you think that will be played by Sweden and Finland - countries historically disinclined to the game - the outcome of the result is obvious in departure.
The enlargement of the collection points, from the current 18,000 to 23,000, will only pulverize even more the game (Lotto sign).
As for the new terminal "Leonardo", the same is ready for a few years (according to As reported by the same technical Sisal), and was still in storage awaiting allocation of the notice and if the same had not been won by Sisal, on terminals now we would have been written "Snai" or "Lottomatica" or anybody else won the invitation.
The real change is the substantial fees paid by receivers that are linked to productivity and the same goes from 800 to 2,000 euros per year and, of course, costs related to telephone lines and so on. Virtually receivers will make a payment to a Sisal "piecework".
With this "real" change and the expansion of the network is Sisal ensure the return of investments, in a very short time, the rest is pure profit compared with a dummy and a change in business risk to zero.
But let's be realistic! The Superenalotto
month after month has consistently negative in the collection and Sisal which is to launch it again? Increases clearance points, increases the amount of the percentage of winnings of low-end (a three from the current € 10.-About-can win, how much? € 20.), But with the same formula of play the odds will always be the same and it will not be the choice of Superstar to encourage the players.
The new terminal! Players who cares the new terminal? For them it does not change nothing.
The massive advertising campaign! On what? On an old product, unfair, to which players are gradually moving away?
But let's be serious! This would be the renewal of the lottery? And let us not come the same old joke of "dead wood" to root out, because in the end those who stay and pay enough. In some ways
Lottomatica behaved more "serious": she has renewed the Lot (not within the substance of findings); changed the terminals, has changed the telephone lines, has invested in advertising and so on .... But to the receivers did not pay anything more!
So what? There are more fools or more serious?
Luber
Basically the game does not change if the quotas for the allocation of the winnings and other little things that do not become less certain of what is unfair and that will definitely help make it more palatable.
The steady decline in recent years would suggest to more substantial changes, not just a change of "habit", which in fact is. The new lottery
announced and called "Eurojackpot" is ridiculous when compared with the already proven and disclosed "Euromillions", and if you think that will be played by Sweden and Finland - countries historically disinclined to the game - the outcome of the result is obvious in departure.
The enlargement of the collection points, from the current 18,000 to 23,000, will only pulverize even more the game (Lotto sign).
As for the new terminal "Leonardo", the same is ready for a few years (according to As reported by the same technical Sisal), and was still in storage awaiting allocation of the notice and if the same had not been won by Sisal, on terminals now we would have been written "Snai" or "Lottomatica" or anybody else won the invitation.
The real change is the substantial fees paid by receivers that are linked to productivity and the same goes from 800 to 2,000 euros per year and, of course, costs related to telephone lines and so on. Virtually receivers will make a payment to a Sisal "piecework".
With this "real" change and the expansion of the network is Sisal ensure the return of investments, in a very short time, the rest is pure profit compared with a dummy and a change in business risk to zero.
But let's be realistic! The Superenalotto
month after month has consistently negative in the collection and Sisal which is to launch it again? Increases clearance points, increases the amount of the percentage of winnings of low-end (a three from the current € 10.-About-can win, how much? € 20.), But with the same formula of play the odds will always be the same and it will not be the choice of Superstar to encourage the players.
The new terminal! Players who cares the new terminal? For them it does not change nothing.
The massive advertising campaign! On what? On an old product, unfair, to which players are gradually moving away?
But let's be serious! This would be the renewal of the lottery? And let us not come the same old joke of "dead wood" to root out, because in the end those who stay and pay enough. In some ways
Lottomatica behaved more "serious": she has renewed the Lot (not within the substance of findings); changed the terminals, has changed the telephone lines, has invested in advertising and so on .... But to the receivers did not pay anything more!
So what? There are more fools or more serious?
Luber
0 comments:
Post a Comment