With the increasing propensity to play the Italians, to do business of gold are the state agencies and the dealership owned by De Agostini and Lottomatica ie.
instant lotteries (scratch cards), are the height of success than any other game. Lot
now lose millions of euro per year, mainly due to wickedness of some changes to the gioco più antico ( terza estrazione, lotto istantaneo, estratto determinato, raddoppio delle trattenute sulle vincite, ecc.). Il Totocalcio ormai defunto e appannaggio solo di qualche nostalgico appassionato. Il Superenalotto che, al pari del Lotto, sta lentamente agonizzando e, nonostante gli si sia cercato di ridipingere la “facciata”, resta il gioco più iniquo e con probabilità di vincita estremamente basse.
Ma il gratta e vinci non è mai stato così giocato, forse perché da l’impressione di essere un gioco equo ( cosa che di fatto non è), illudendo il giocatore con piccole vincite riscuotibili subito e con una grafica accattivante che ricorda i cartoni animati che nell’immaginario collettivo are considered harmless and innocent.
Scratchcards are the most destructive and alienating to exist, they are a real trap in which those who fall undergoes a sort of brainwashing and can not do without it.
trap for players, but "goose that lays the golden eggs" for those who manage them (AAMS - LOTTOMATICA).
Who played scratchcards has only two choices: Lottomatica play or not play at all. Lottomatica
courtesy of AAMS has the exclusive of scratch cards, has no competition and should not be measured with a pluralistic market, acting under a "monopoly" assuming a dominant position.
La mancanza di trasparenza è tipica dei regimi monopolistici, infatti non è dato di sapere secondo quali criteri vengono emessi i biglietti dei gratta e vinci; perché le percentuali di incasso variano per ogni tipo di gioco; con quali criteri vengono stabilite le probabilità di vincita; qual è la percentuale fissa destinata ai premi per i giocatori.
Tante domande e nessuna risposta o risposte vaghe e per nulla esaurienti.
L’unica cosa certa è che Lottomatica incassa il 12,70% sul prezzo lordo dei biglietti; percentuale che nel 2007 ha fruttato alla società ben 328 milioni di Euro.
Tutto questo alla faccia delle tanto decantate liberalizzazioni e del “gioco sicuro”.
Con questi presupposti and these figures it is easy to see why the historical games (Lotto, Superenalotto, Pools etc..), are left to die slowly. Scratchcards (and follow the slot), make a lot more at lower cost and power of attraction with a much higher figure. In 2007, the only positive signs, the entire games industry, were data from scratch and from the slot, all the other showed a negative sign, continuing the trend of 2006 and 2005.
In short these games, with their wickedness, but with a high power of "seduction," are "window dressing" that attract (by fraud), millions of people and spills them a great bunch of money in exchange for a sweetener in a while.
The lords of the "palace" and Lottomatica raking in plenty of money without risk and with little expense.
What's even more shameful is that the "theft" is legal: there are laws and provisions to endorse, all for the benefit of only two subjects: AAMS and Lottomatica and to the detriment of the entire community.
If you think that the justification for the third extraction, by AAMS, was that this will discourage people from playing big money on the laggards thus avoiding the creation of strong social harm for families on the facts we realize that in fact he was only going to move AAMS people's interest on the scratch (and slot), which have a higher yield with minimum investment. In the face of "socially useful"!
perplexing behavior of different consumer groups, those that occurred a few years ago were overwhelmingly against the slot (not yet under the "domain" of AAMS), infernal machines that were ruining families, inciting to suicide, those for which many fathers and mothers were stoned capital and sold homes (as they then expressed the various associations). Well, those same organizations where they are now? Why are silent in the face of the phenomenon of scratch cards and the same slot (now blessed by AAMS)?
Maybe they found some "interesting" hidden so now everything is fine?
It 'clear that with the scratch cards and slot receivers also have a nice gain, but gain that compensates the loss of historical games, for which the development of systems and methods of play could express their professionalism and their skills acquired through years of work.
The scratch cards and slots, however, reducing them to a professional mortify those miserable "exchange of money" and an equally miserable "sale of postcards" the counter. Work for which anyone would be appropriate and should not pay heavy taxes and several guarantees that go to fatten the already fat coffers of dealers.
Unfortunately, with morality and honesty are not intellectual prepares the plates and then one must inevitably be subject to the law of god experiencing money in his name, blackmail and harassment of any kind. The indifference and inertia forces them to rebel then turn away without even showing the slightest sign of disgust.
Luber
