From the above data (source AAMS) states that the entire sector "games" is based almost exclusively on the Scratch & Win and Slots.
fact these are the only two positive entries in the table, all the others are the hyphen.
Despite this, the total tax revenues is up by 7.1% and this is enough to claim victory AAMS and its strategy, defined by the same body, winning.
For operators, however, these data should make us think, should highlight how the professionals are mortified exclusively for the benefit of profit and economic interests of the various "lobbies" which hold the concessions.
The receiver as such is intended to gradually disappear, to become a "money changers" (if this is not the automatic), a "rubber-stamping" and so on.
And all this is added the fact that will not (as has not yet), no decision making on corporate strategies.
This leads, inevitably, the accentuation of the power managed by the various dealers, with the complicity of the AAMS, operating real "blackmail" like "you want the corner? You have to put my slot, "and in a little ', "the Superenalotto want? You have to put my slot, "and so on.
I should not wonder if similar "strategies" were soon applied also on "scratch"!
The traditional games such as Lotto, The Pools, the Tris etc. Professionalism of those games where the receiver is crucial, where the relationship is established directly with customers - nearly custom - no longer interested in the "lords of the palace" that In fact, with a series of targeted measures (third extraction, increased the deductions on your winnings, etc..), they made sure that people constantly move away from those games (and the data are clear about this) diverting their attention on the Scratch & Win and Slots.
Those games where the chimera of instant win game and without mental effort, create a relationship of dependency that will not be able to do without.
The alarm on social issues related to gambling reflects the widespread perception of the growing seriousness of the problem. The massive invasion of slot machines, the huge growth of the legal opportunities to gamble ("Scratch") feeds the vain hope (the-Ludere-enter the game) of many, and we know that the second half of Hope is often called de-illusion (always referring etymon- out of the game-). But at the same time, it is evident unthinkability to intervene on issues related to gambling through prohibitionist perspective, (the idea of \u200b\u200boutright banning many forms of gambling as well as be extremely unpopular would deprive the state of substantial economic resources to see that revenues for the game are a real form of taxation in parallel.). If we consider the problem of a compulsive gambler in analogy to the problem of addiction is clear that the "drug dealer" would be more important than the state itself, so that should go first to the dock, the player's mind that would fall into disrepair (and all the effect is) the person to help. We also know that social policy of strict prohibition, they do but the development of alternative circuits illegal immigrants.
And it is precisely this that the State "play" not for nothing that AAMS's slogan is "fair play", but despite all the clandestine game has not diminished, in fact, criminal organizations have even entered the so-called "fair play" .
But back to the receivers.
receivers, as always, they follow the wave, the exclusive interest of the workshop: "scratchcards make most of the Lotto? Well! I sell more scratch! "But the professionalism? The development and deployment of systems? Who cares! A less effort, with the scratch cards earn more and work less!
Verissimo, if they make a decision like that and it is in some respects, it is also rightly so, in the end is the result that counts.
but I can not explain why many receivers complain about the decline of Lotto, the Super and the other games, just sell the scratch cards and keep a couple of slots to compensate for the losses and even to earn more with less effort.
But in the end who really are the receivers?
can safely be called the "serf"
Servitude of serfdom was a judicial figure that tied the peasants to a specific plot of land (serfs, in Latin, it is the " sod " land) . The serfs cultivated the funds that belonged to the landlords, paying a rent . They were also to pay tenth (if the owner was part of the clergy or was a ecclesiastical entity ) and were obliged to provide certain services work ( corvées ). The serfs were such birth, and could not (legally) to avoid that condition without the consent of the owner of the land. In connection with the work for the clearing of new lands, often gave the owner who shall bear the burden of moving to new areas in particular freedom ( deductibles ) And privileges: hence the name "Villafranca" given to many places.
services to which the serfs were required, it should be noted, unlike slavery did not have a generic, but they were precisely defined. Moreover, the serfs, unlike slaves, were not considered " things " but people were entitled to Private , though limited to goods mobile, they could marry, have children to whom to leave a ' legacy . The feudal was not entitled to the life of a serf but could be sold with land on which he had the right and duty to remain.
me the similarities are clear, and, above all, very contemporary.
Luber
